In an Ontario asset deal, a payout-and-discharge condition should identify the evidence required before affected purchase funds move and the duties that may continue after closing. It should connect the relevant registration to the authorized payee, payment direction, interim release or undertaking, filing responsibility, target date, confirmation evidence and exception process. The Clause answers how pre-funding evidence and post-closing discharge duties can be separated and bounded in one operative condition. The exact wording depends on the agreement, registration, secured-party response, lender requirements and closing chronology.
Where does the condition fit?
The condition sits inside a broader buyer decision. The Counsel Note explains how registration risk, closing-price exposure and discharge timing work together before funds move. This Clause stays with the Timeline mechanism: what is a true funding precondition, what can follow under a controlled arrangement, and what evidence closes the exception. That boundary matters because a strong search analysis cannot cure an unbounded payment condition, while careful condition wording cannot resolve an unidentified asset match or unsupported payout amount.
What should the pre-funding side establish?
The mechanism should begin with the registration and payment instruction. Ontario's guidance directs a buyer who finds a registration to contact the lender for current information. The condition can then identify the registration number, the current statement or release terms, the authorized payee and account, the amount or calculation through the closing date, and the evidence required before payment. Where a release, direction or undertaking provides interim protection, the record should name who gives it, what it covers and how it connects the payment to the promised discharge work.
What should remain controlled after closing?
Payment is only one point in the chronology. The Ontario guidance distinguishes repayment of a loan from registration of a discharge. The condition should therefore allocate the filing step, set a target or outside date, require confirmation evidence, schedule a follow-up search and identify who owns a delayed, rejected or disputed result. The PPSA search-to-discharge Checklist applies this mechanism through pre-funding deliverables and a post-closing follow-up log, so the buyer can compare the condition with the records actually in hand.
What should the buyer prepare?
Before agreeing to the condition, prepare one short schedule for counsel. List each material registration, the asset connection, the current payout or release evidence, the required pre-funding deliverable, the person responsible for filing, the target date, the confirmation record and the exception response. Then test the condition against three situations: everything is complete at funding; payment and interim protection are complete but registry confirmation will follow; or a required direction, undertaking, filing duty or outside date is missing. The transaction response may differ in each situation, and the clause should leave that choice visible rather than assuming payment resolves every step.
